Home CalChamber CalBizCentral Forum Sign In
HR California Discussion Forum
               

Home » HRCalifornia » Benefits » $ instead of health insurance


$ instead of health insurance Expand / Collapse
Author
Message
Posted 7/25/2007 4:24:04 PM
 
Is it o.k. to give an employee a hourly wage increase because they don't participate in the health insurance program? Is it o.k. to say, "Since you aren't in the health insurance program, we will increase your wages $1 per hour" As long as you do the same for every employee that doesn't participate, and you don't decrease their wages if at a later time they do join the health insurance plan.
Post #1557
Posted 7/27/2007 3:26:19 PM
 
At my company what we did was offer employees who elected not to participate in the medical benefits $100.00 per month. The reason we did not increase the wage is because not many of our employees are paid hourly. It is also better for us to track actual merit vs. benefit increases.
Post #1562
Posted 8/1/2007 3:44:13 PM
 
Yes, you need to keep your apples and oranges separate. If you compound it in the hourly rate, several different things happen. You have to pay overtime at that rate and you may end up paying more in the long run. Also, the employee (and sometimes the employer) forget that the $1.00 raise had to do with the bonus. In the long run, it's best practice to keep the insurance bonus separate from wages.
Post #1570
« Prev Topic | Next Topic »



 
TERMS OF USE PRIVACY SITE MAP ABOUT US CONTACT US © 2008 California Chamber of Commerce